# Martijn Verburg's Manager Readme

**CEO at jClarity**

# Motivation for this document

This is my Manager README, a document that helps introduce you to my management style, philosophy, and expectations.&nbsp;The intended audience is primarily anyone who reports to me in a commercial setting or more informally in a Java / FOSS ecosystem project.

Please treat it as a reference and promise on how I will conduct myself as well as&nbsp;what I find helpful when working with others.&nbsp;I urge you to hold me accountable to my promises, and to call out anything that might be missing from this document!

# My role

As a **CEO** I'm measured by various KPIs by the stakeholders of the whole company.&nbsp; This includes (but is not limited to):

- **My Board -** Strategic vision and&nbsp;growth. e.g. Are we growing users, customers, revenue and are we taking advantage of and / or leading market trends.
- **Employees / Staff -** &nbsp;Facilitating a culture that encourages autonomy, personal growth, shared values, diversity, workplace flexibility and enjoyment!
- **Customers -&nbsp;** Products that delight and help solve real world problems, providing quick turnaround for&nbsp;support issues and taking into account their feature requests and requirements.

As a **Java and Open Source&nbsp;Community leader** I'm measured by various KPIs by the stakeholders in the ecosystem.&nbsp; This includes (but is not limited to):

- **Vendors -** To provide impartial commentary, advice, guidance and insights from the end users (developer community). To provide technical and legal review of specifications and help set strategic direction for the ecosystem.&nbsp;To assist in negotiations between vendors when requested.
- **End Users (Developers)&nbsp;-**&nbsp;To champion the needs of the end users (~10M+&nbsp;developers) and to facilitate communication between them and the vendors in the ecosystem.

In all cases I set **strategic vision** (shaped by expert stakeholders) for the organisation and then&nbsp;create the technical and cultural infrastructure to allow individuals and teams fulfil that vision.&nbsp; That usually means&nbsp;stepping back to let&nbsp;tactical decisions get made and executed by the experts and&nbsp;practising&nbsp;[Servant Leadership](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servant_leadership).

# What do I value most?

I value open cultures, diversity (and not just lip service to it), self starters and willingness to learn.&nbsp; I greatly value domain experts and my default position is to let those people do their job and interfere as little as possible!&nbsp;&nbsp;

I believe in building&nbsp;quality software and lasting communities, which then&nbsp;naturally leads to happy customers / users and (in a commercial setting) increased&nbsp;revenue.

# My expectations

I expect people to be have done a little bit of research or homework before asking me directly for help, especially with regards to understanding the strategy and their place in it.&nbsp; If that's not well understood, then I/we have a challenge to solve.

I prefer email as the initial way of kicking off an activity but then I find F2F (virtual or in person) and real time communications (e.g. Slack the most productive).

In terms of product delivery&nbsp;I define done when it's in the hands of a customer who can give us feedback after it's gone through rigorous automated testing, a code review by a human and the whole organisation understands why that feature went in and what impact it will have.

In the (fairly rare) instances where I need to manage&nbsp;conflict my first step is usually to make all&nbsp;parties aware of their own backgrounds and biases and have them think about why the opposing party is taking a particular position. I expect people therefore to be openminded to others.

I have **zero tolerance** for gas lighting, or harassment on grounds of sex, race, gender identity etc.

A&nbsp;major challenge for me&nbsp;is knowing when to say "No" before overloading my schedule. That can&nbsp;lead to me&nbsp;only spend a relatively short amount of time on a particular issue or task before I'm context switching to something else.&nbsp;It's not that I'm unwilling to help, it's just that I often have a lot of open 1-1 communication channels open.&nbsp;It's helpful if you let me know that you really need X&nbsp;amount of my time, or that I'm the wrong person to tackle X&nbsp;or that you need a&nbsp;regular catchup in order for something to succeed.

The organisations and teams I currently work with are all distributed / remote teams.&nbsp; I do my best to hold core office hours where folks can reliably get hold of me and work around the more difficult time zones as best I&nbsp;can&nbsp;with an early morning or late night coffee!

# 1:1s

I usually hold 1-1's informally once a month and formally each quarter.&nbsp; I prefer the 1-1 to be lead by you.&nbsp;

I'll usually cover how the person feels about how they've met&nbsp;our&nbsp;strategic goals, improved themselves (I'm a fan of pushing people a little bit past their comfort zones - stretch goals if you will), any issues their reports have raised.&nbsp; Then I cover if there is&nbsp;anything I can do to make them more productive&nbsp;and simply whether they're happy or not!

# Personality Quirks

I tend to make decisions quickly but will happily back track or reverse a policy if new information comes to light.&nbsp; My Dutch parents installed my strong trait of&nbsp;crossing 't's and dotting 'i's so I can be pedantic about accuracy.&nbsp; I prefer data driven decision making.

I'm not great with remembering names or personal details about a person which are important to them and so I need to work on that.

I'm an extroverted introvert.&nbsp; That is, I greatly enjoy public speaking, facilitating and talking to people.&nbsp; But afterwards I need some proper decompression time alone.

I'm happy to receive brutally honest feedback on whether I've been helpful to that person or if they feel I've had a negative impact on them or other parts of the organisation.

# Where to focus on your first 90 days?

For my first 90 days I always observe, listen and then set about resolving any dysfunctional relationships between teams and individuals.&nbsp; This may involve introducing structural changes (with buy in from staff). After that I set out the strategic vision and work with leaders in the organisation on how they can tactically go and fulfil that.

For your first 90 days,&nbsp;I prefer that you use&nbsp;self service on boarding with regards to any technical setup.&nbsp; So reading the documentation and working through the steps (and making suggestions!) is the best way to on board in an organisation that I lead.

Asking existing folks about the shared culture and values and what they see the strategy as is also important.&nbsp; If their lists don't match each other's or the ones that I've discussed with you, I want to know!

